Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Without seeing the NBA's data sets (which includes data on specific refs and specific players--which Wolfers's study explicitly notes it's lacking) this whole issue just screams out for a Simpson's Paradox or, at the least, Absent or Hidden Data construal. Without knowing which ref called fouls on which player, there are other hypotheses consistent with the data. Add to that that part of the authors' methodology relied on the memories (sic!) of former refs as to who was working what game and this thing starts to look a lot weaker than it's playing.

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

The study looked good to me; see here:http://www.stat.columbia.ed...

Expand full comment
1 more comment...