Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

So econ informs on how to get what we want, and morality informs on what we should do. Econ is regarding the supply and demand of goods and services. Morality is concerned with good and bad. Ok, the first distinction is economics defining economics. The second is morality defining morality. What about each domains definition of the other domain?

• What is the morality based definition of economics?• What is the economics definition of morality?

Regarding the first point; how can the moralist hope to handle economics sans economic theory?On the second point; Economics deals with quantities such as supply, demand, price and efficiency. The economics definition of morality concerns how the moralist hopes to manipulate these variables, and for what affect. So take a supply and demand cross and ask; what does the moralist want to do here? It must be something to do with moving away from equilibrium. Otherwise why bother?

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Phil's critique is interesting but, I think wrong. Desire utilitarianism is specifically limited to the domain of malleable desires - those that can be manipulated through social pressure. That means the buddhism option is right out. Moreover, satanism is probably out too given that people have prosocial traits like reciprocity, guilt, and sympathy.

A better critique is that desire utilitarianism is nothing but nash bargaining problem between large numbers of people. The nature of the social contract and our social norms are themselves the product of a bargaining problem. Thus it suffers from all the problems that happen in bargaining situations in which there is a powerful actor with a large threat advantage. It is justice as mutual advantage in a new dress, not preference utilitarianism or anything unique. See also my criticism based on the case of the 900 racists

Expand full comment
87 more comments...