Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Well, they don't "survive only on radioactive decay". The paper proposes that radiolysis acts on water and bicarbonate to provide some metabolic precursors that the bacteria need. But the precursors have to be there in abundance, and importantly, everything happens in an aqueous environment at 60°C. Their environment is wet and scalding hot - not what you find in a comet. Whether they could survive dormant in a deep-frozen piece of rock in interstellar space is an open question, of course -- but the data provided by the current study do not address that question. I don't think the odds on panspermia get an update with this discovery.

As an aside, the name Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator is very interesting. The Candidatus is because it's never been seen - its existence is inferred from isolated DNA. Desulforudis refers to its metabolism. audaxviator, according to Wikipedia,

...comes of a quotation from Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth. The hero, Professor Lidenbrock, finds a secret inscription in Latin that reads: Descende, audax viator, et terrestre centrum attinges (Descend, bold traveller, and you will attain the center of the Earth).

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

"Stars pass close enough to each other often enough as to swap some of their comet clouds, and reproduction would be needed to counter natural decay I think."

In deep space, even if the organism's metabolism is powered entirely by radioactive decay, the loss of heat would prevent metabolic activity and reproduction. Even with modern engineering, there's no power source capable of sustaining the kinds of temperatures necessary for reproduction for millions of years, short of a full-scale nuclear reactor (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wik....

Expand full comment
15 more comments...