Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robin Hanson's avatar

OK, uncle, I guess the result isn't as interesting as I'd thought.

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Just to expand on what Steve Burrows wrote, I quote Lubos Motl in "fast comments" here:

'While the 2007 MAGIC paper may have speculated about 2.5 sigma signals suggesting "Yes, there is energy dependence", the new 2009 FERMI result is really a 100 sigma measurement saying "No, there can't be any". And believe me, 100 sigma is not 40 times statistically stronger than 2.5 sigma: it's exp(5000) times stronger.'

According to this null-hypothesis interpretation, the low-energy photons from Markarian 501 didn't "outpace their higher-energy counterparts", they were simply emitted earlier. And the difference in energies is due to the structure of the astrophysical source.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...