Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Diamond's avatar

I think practitioners understand that more granularly than do researchers.

Is your conclusion based on first-hand knowledge re trainers, or economic deduction (from the fact of a highly competitive market)?

In bringing up steroids, I think you're missing part of the point. If you asked an exercise physiologist about anabolic steroids, surely he or she would not then deny effect (both favorable and adverse).

Expand full comment
brendan_r's avatar

Yeah, sure, the primary gain Barry Bonds reaped by growing from 190 to 240 lbs was mental.

Same with roided-up race horses- all placebo I'm sure.

Look, I could easily envision steroids helping some struggling baseball player's confidence and amplifying the physical gains.

And I can point to careers ruined by steroids: NFL receiver David Boston ballooned from 210 to 260 lbs of pure muscle, ruining his speed, durability and career. The guy overdid it big time, probably due to some mental quirk similar to what motivates anorexics.

So it's complicated, and I think practitioners understand that more granularly than do researchers.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...