Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

Is there a link between "recreational" drug use and promiscuity? Such a link is unlikely for users of opiates, barbiturates, or tranquilizers. It also is unlikely for users of hallucinogens such as LSD or peyote. There may be a link between promiscuity and use of amphetamines, cocaine, ecstasy, etc., but it probably is less strong than the link between promiscuity and use of ethanol.

The survey, as usual, seems to be badly designed. It interviewed only college-aged young adults and a paid, self-selected group of internet users. Political orientation was based on a self-assessment question, a method that always minimizes the extremes. (For example, people who would objectively be classified as far left-liberal often call themselves slightly left of center.) The sexuality scale was partly based on the number of "non-intercourse" partners in the past three years. I cannot see how that is an indicator of acceptance of promiscuity.

This study did not ask about ethanol use. It asked specifically about marijuana, cocaine, and ecstasy use, but it lumped all recreational drugs together in later survey items. The exclusion of ethanol and most categories of recreational drugs weakens the study.

My reading of the paper is that the authors first established their models and drew their conclusions, and then designed the study. Not surprisingly, their belief that attitudes about recreational drugs would correlate with reproductive strategies was supported by this study.

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

I don't think drugs and sex are directly related or a cause of one another, but both result from "novelty seeking".

It has been shown that persons with a high score for the trait of novelty seeking have more sexual partners over their lifetime than similar people with lower scores.

And people with lower scores for novelty seeking are more likely to be monogamous and not use drugs because they don't crave those new experiences.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...