Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

I find it interesting that the initial premise of this article starts off talking about social orders and how magic tends to recreate standing social orders but instead of delving into THAT more and how technology (logistically? oppositely?) could create a different/better/whatever social order, the article spins off to pine about nostalgia etc. I like what Neal Soldofsky had to say and some of what mjgeddes said about creativity. I think the article's view of magic is simplistic to say the least. In general I tend to believe that a lot of what magic explains in one way, science is trying to explain in another but they are a lot closer (talking about unseen forces) than either might like to admit. The way they are studied definitely differs. In terms of whether magic recreates the same OLD social order hmmm. "Magic" can be traced back in and through as threads of many different cultures. of whom their social orders radically differed. So if "Magic" is trying to recreate a social order, maybe it isn't just of one type. But if many people relate to the idea of magic maybe it is because at one point in our long and varied histories, our own cultures had some sort of association with such an idea and it wasn't like it was a bad word all the time to be spit out of the side of your mouth with complete disregard. I am using that word "Magic" since that is the word tossed out in the article. But there could be other words to substituted in its place: a way of describing unseen forces, a way of describing an occurrence that seems to be operating under laws more unpredictable than those usually visible, etc.

Expand full comment
Overcoming Bias Commenter's avatar

I don't know much about the genres, but here's a list of Hugo awards for best novel from 1953 to the present:http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Expand full comment
24 more comments...