Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Fast's avatar

If I told you Robin Hanson posted X, and you couldn't ask him yourself, is there a better way to determine the validity of my claim than " the extent to which the alleged post's nature and words agree with the nature and words of previous allegedly valid Hansonian posts"?

In fact, isn't that one definition of "continuing identity"?

Expand full comment
TedC2's avatar

This is what happens an agnostic re-writes Mormon mythology.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...