Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Blissex's avatar

«In addition, we’ve become more wary of using harsh punishments, like torture, death, or exile»

Torture or death (and some forms of exile) are very common, just not for middle class people. Because middle class people don't like paying taxes to fund proper processing of suspected violators, they have given enforcers the ability to torture and kill "on suspicion" the underclass. The enforcers use routinely such a blank cheque. "Due process" is expensive, and underclass people are cheap, and the middle classes, especially after the 1960s riots, want them to be terrorized.

«For example, colleges that admit people just on GPA and test scores can be more open to lower class students than colleges that require applicants to have adopted the right set of extracurricular actives, and to have hit on the right themes in their essays. Lower class people can find it is easier to get good grades and scores than to track the new fashions in activities and essays.»

The original (pre-WW2 and perhaps even pre-WW1) rationale for using extracurricular activities and essays as paramount in admission to "top jobs" granting colleges was to exclude the sons of jewish mothers, quite a few decades ago: on simple admission exams they were "stealing", like asian students today, the places that should have gone to the sons of WASP mothers. IIRC at some point sons of jewish mothers were winning around 20-30% of admissions even at a WASP finishing school like Harvard, because jewish mothers were much better at being "tiger moms" and squeezing their sons very hard for admission exams.

Expand full comment
victoria wilson - mn's avatar

I think why it appears that groups are jumping directly to exclusion rather than working through norms is twofold. First, people seem to have forgotten that it takes work; work to educate, nudge and influence new comers to norms. They seem to want ready-made just-like-me buddies to pop into their lives. Second, some groups are being shocked into realising that even though they profess to be inclusionary, they are only selectively so. From feminists who are really only pro-choice feminists, to champions of the down trodden but only those foreign born not the middle American ones, to vocal activists who must sway to a particular political agenda or be chased from the public square.

Interestingly, the incredible power of action at cross-cutting group purposes flexed extraordinary muscle this year when a cross-section of women tackled a universal objective and, perhaps unexpectedly, ended up making powerful, career ending plays against predators who have kept all women in check. If nothing else comes of the caotic social shuffling this year, the message of this benefit, to build coalitions with groups at seemingly opposite philosophical vantages, will hopefully ring true and loud as we start the new year.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...